The top 10 reasons I voted your comment down on Reddit
Like everyone else on the internet, I'm always complaining that it used to be better back before they let the riff-raff in. But this might be extra true on Reddit, which used to be all about Haskell, Damn Interesting, the latest essay and/or breakfast choice from Paul Graham. Lately, the number of "hey here's a picture of a funny crazy car" posts has gone way up. Please, people, let's all pull together and help keep Reddit smart.
In the spirit of helpfulness, I present: The top 10 reasons I voted your comment down
10. You said "dupe". This ain't slashdot. Just vote it down. That's what the arrows are there for.
9. You said "dupe"...and you weren't the first. Please read up on irony.
8. You complained about a story having too many up votes, and called the people who upvoted stupid. The audience for your complaint? Those same people.
7. You posted an otherwise content-free comment saying "this link is awesome". That's what the arrows are there for.
6. You "new commented" when you wanted to reply. God, that annoys me. I did this last week and almost had to kill myself.
5. You blamed it all on the Jews, blacks, or Mexicans.
4. You complained about reddit being overrun by liberals, or athiests, or conservatives, or socialists, or freepers, or Ron Paul supporters, or Mike Gravel supporters, or nerds, or non-nerds, or Jewish black Mexicans. You know what? Maybe there really is a cabal. And now they think you suck.
3. You posted an otherwise content-free comment saying "this link is lame". That's what the arrows are there for.
2. You asked a question which Google could have answered in less time than it took to actually type your question.
1. Your comment was just really, really stupid. That's what Digg is there for.
I'll admit it: I'm a blog/message board addict. One of the most frustrating rhetorical devices people use in these forums is "Willful ignorance". It's actually easier to appear to "win" a debate on some subjects the less you know about that subject. So many people deliberately avoid learning anything about the subject at hand, and ignore any information that comes their way.
The anti-global-warming crowd seems to be expert at this--they'll ask the same questions over and over again, never pausing to listen for an answer. They don't want an answer, they want to distract the debate, wear down the opponent, and confuse bystanders into thinking they've raised a good point. I swear if I see the misinformation "volcanoes CO2 dwarfs the CO2 that humans do every year" again (wrong!) I'll scream.
Fortunately, New Scientist has produced a round-up of the 26 most common climate myths and misconceptions that addresses most of these common untruths. I'm not sure that this will do anything to combat the willful ignorance, but at least it provides a handy and quick way to respond.
Jones Soda is bucking the trend, although if you read carefully they say "all of your favorite Jones products will be available with real sugar"...which makes me worry: will there be two versions, a corn syrup and non-corn syrup version?
In any case, foreign-born sodas almost always use sugar (because it's cheaper for them), so... drink more Jarritos! Perhaps I can get this blog sponsored by them.
I finally bit the bullet and bought a torque wrench for a project I'm working on. Actually, I bought two torque wrenches, since no single wrench covered the range of torques I need. The combined range of the two wrenches covers from 2 to 150 ft-pounds.
Another great sci-fi short: Ray Bradbury, "All Summer in a Day"
There's a short list of science fiction stories that are not just good, they're actually perfect. One of those is by Ray Bradbury: All Summer in a Day.
I used to read Instapundit as a way to take the pulse of the right-hand side of the political spectrum. While I usually didn't agree with author Glenn Reynolds, I at least felt he was presenting an honest defense of his conservative viewpoint. But over the past few years, he's slowly become a predictable megaphone for the right-wing talking point of the day, punctuated by the occasional smarmy "heh" or "indeed" comment.
Foul play is suspected in the death of an accounts receivable supervisor for a regional office-supply company, sheriff's deputies reported Tuesday. More here.